User ceb580837f
10-03-2006 13:53:42
jchem3[1].1.5 is in use!
Dear Sirs,
with regard to the above mentioned class (in a great package) I have a
question! The function of this class is either not completely clear to
me or it has mistakes!
First the elucidation of the method:
> is the method made to make a comparison between two structures and give only "true" if two molecules are completely identical?
Second could there be mistakes in your program
> when I apply this method for the comparison of two structures, especially with five-membered aromatic rings, it returns "true" for for examples the molecules 1 and 2 and a similar result is obtained for the molecule 3 and 4.
Although the properties, like aromaticity, atom count, bond count,
etc. are identical these molecules clearly differ in connectivity and
can not be treated as chemically identical.
The result was especially surprising since the same method was applied
to - for example structure 5 and 6. In this case the molecule has
completely identical properties (3xN, 3xC, aromaticity, etc) but only
differs in connectivity. And as said in this case the method returned
false. So finally the method seemed not really consistent to me and I
have the suspicion on a mistake in the method.
Thanks for your answer in advance,
Ruud van Deursen
Dear Sirs,
with regard to the above mentioned class (in a great package) I have a
question! The function of this class is either not completely clear to
me or it has mistakes!
First the elucidation of the method:
> is the method made to make a comparison between two structures and give only "true" if two molecules are completely identical?
Second could there be mistakes in your program
> when I apply this method for the comparison of two structures, especially with five-membered aromatic rings, it returns "true" for for examples the molecules 1 and 2 and a similar result is obtained for the molecule 3 and 4.
Although the properties, like aromaticity, atom count, bond count,
etc. are identical these molecules clearly differ in connectivity and
can not be treated as chemically identical.
The result was especially surprising since the same method was applied
to - for example structure 5 and 6. In this case the molecule has
completely identical properties (3xN, 3xC, aromaticity, etc) but only
differs in connectivity. And as said in this case the method returned
false. So finally the method seemed not really consistent to me and I
have the suspicion on a mistake in the method.
Thanks for your answer in advance,
Ruud van Deursen