User 2876451752
03-12-2012 17:41:35
Hello everyone,
I'm trying to find the best structure possible to draw Fe(CO)3 complexes and being able to find the corresponding structure with JChem. However, I'm not able to find those complexes with coordination bonds neither when drawing each carbonyl with the different charges (see different examples in attachment; the CO abreviation does'nt exist). If I put covalent bonds, the Molecular Weight is obviously then different than the real one.
Moreover, I would like to indicate the stereochemistry on this kind of coordination bond. Is it possible ?
Thank you for your help,
Vincent
ChemAxon abe887c64e
04-12-2012 10:31:12
Hello Vincent,
Thank you for your question.
We found that two - where all bonds of Fe are coordinative - out of your example structures are correct, and JChem have to find them. With which JChem version, database table type, and search type have you experienced the missing hits?
Unfortunately, indication of stereochemistry is not possible in combination with the coordinative bond type.
As for the abbreviated groups there is a possibility to create user defined abbreviated groups as well. See documentation here: http://www.chemaxon.com/marvin/help/sketch/sketch-basic.html#abbreviatedgroups
Best regards,
Krisztina
User 2876451752
04-12-2012 14:16:58
Hello Krisztina,
we have some trouble with multicenters in the 5.8 version of MarvinSketch that we use in our soft.
So, the third way to draw Fe(CO)3 (only with covalent bonds) is for us the best one at that time.
Have you envisioned to allow stereochemistry on coordination bonds in the future ?
Thank you,
Vincent
ChemAxon abe887c64e
05-12-2012 11:04:11
User 2876451752
05-12-2012 11:42:27
Hello Krisztina,
thank you for this information.
It may be interesting to add some comments about stereochemistry and in particular relative configuration of coordinative bonds.
I think "Attached data" should be sufficient to indicate stereochemistry of Fe(CO)3 that is commonly used for resolution of a racemic mixture with a metal complex.
Best regards,
Vincent