Need to clarify search with/without charge

User a7faa21887

23-10-2011 14:47:55

Hi,


Currenly we use JChem 5.6.0.2 in Oracle Database 10.2.0.5 x86_64.


We have N-Alkylpicoline.mol in table with JCHem index with parameters: 'structureType=anyStructures,fp_size=32,fp_bit=2,pat_length=6,duplicateFiltering=n


We tried to find N-Alkylpicoline_without_charge.mol, that differs from first with charges only.


So, we used these search options for jc_compare:


t:f charge:d
t:f charge:i
t:d charge:d
t:d charge:i


without any result.


Pavel

ChemAxon a3d59b832c

24-10-2011 13:48:19

Hi Pavel,


The problem is that the charged molecule is recognized as aromatic, while the uncharged as non-aromatic. It seems to me that the uncharged version also has a valence error. This might cause the problem, but my colleague will confirm.


 


Best regards,


Szabolcs

User a7faa21887

24-10-2011 16:08:42










Szabolcs wrote:

Hi Pavel,


The problem is that the charged molecule is recognized as aromatic, while the uncharged as non-aromatic. It seems to me that the uncharged version also has a valence error. This might cause the problem, but my colleague will confirm.


 


Best regards,


Szabolcs



Thanks for reply, Szabolcs. I'll send your comment to our chemists (I don't know about a half of words from comment :))

ChemAxon 25dcd765a3

24-10-2011 17:05:25

Yes I confirm Szabolcs's note. The non-charged version is not aromatized due to the missing positive charge.


If you manually add the missing positive charge (see my attachment) then the molecule will be aromatized.