User a7faa21887
		23-10-2011 14:47:55
	 
	
	
	Hi,
Currenly we use JChem 5.6.0.2 in Oracle Database 10.2.0.5 x86_64.
We have N-Alkylpicoline.mol in table with JCHem index with parameters: 'structureType=anyStructures,fp_size=32,fp_bit=2,pat_length=6,duplicateFiltering=n
We tried to find N-Alkylpicoline_without_charge.mol, that differs from first with charges only.
So, we used these search options for jc_compare:
t:f charge:d
t:f charge:i
t:d charge:d 
t:d charge:i
without any result.
Pavel
	
	 
 
	
		ChemAxon a3d59b832c
		24-10-2011 13:48:19
	 
	
	
	Hi Pavel,
The problem is that the charged molecule is recognized as aromatic, while the uncharged as non-aromatic. It seems to me that the uncharged version also has a valence error. This might cause the problem, but my colleague will confirm.
 
Best regards,
Szabolcs
	
	 
 
	
		User a7faa21887
		24-10-2011 16:08:42
	 
	
	
	
Szabolcs wrote: | 
 Hi Pavel, 
 The problem is that the charged molecule is recognized as aromatic, while the uncharged as non-aromatic. It seems to me that the uncharged version also has a valence error. This might cause the problem, but my colleague will confirm. 
   
 Best regards, 
 Szabolcs 
 | 
Thanks for reply, Szabolcs. I'll send your comment to our chemists (I don't know about a half of words from comment :))
	
	 
 
	
		ChemAxon 25dcd765a3
		24-10-2011 17:05:25
	 
	
	
	Yes I confirm Szabolcs's note. The non-charged version is not aromatized due to the missing positive charge.
If you manually add the missing positive charge (see my attachment) then the molecule will be aromatized.