User a7faa21887
23-10-2011 14:47:55
Hi,
Currenly we use JChem 5.6.0.2 in Oracle Database 10.2.0.5 x86_64.
We have N-Alkylpicoline.mol in table with JCHem index with parameters: 'structureType=anyStructures,fp_size=32,fp_bit=2,pat_length=6,duplicateFiltering=n
We tried to find N-Alkylpicoline_without_charge.mol, that differs from first with charges only.
So, we used these search options for jc_compare:
t:f charge:d
t:f charge:i
t:d charge:d
t:d charge:i
without any result.
Pavel
ChemAxon a3d59b832c
24-10-2011 13:48:19
Hi Pavel,
The problem is that the charged molecule is recognized as aromatic, while the uncharged as non-aromatic. It seems to me that the uncharged version also has a valence error. This might cause the problem, but my colleague will confirm.
Best regards,
Szabolcs
User a7faa21887
24-10-2011 16:08:42
Szabolcs wrote: |
Hi Pavel,
The problem is that the charged molecule is recognized as aromatic, while the uncharged as non-aromatic. It seems to me that the uncharged version also has a valence error. This might cause the problem, but my colleague will confirm.
Best regards,
Szabolcs
|
Thanks for reply, Szabolcs. I'll send your comment to our chemists (I don't know about a half of words from comment :))
ChemAxon 25dcd765a3
24-10-2011 17:05:25
Yes I confirm Szabolcs's note. The non-charged version is not aromatized due to the missing positive charge.
If you manually add the missing positive charge (see my attachment) then the molecule will be aromatized.