User f698d0529d
12-05-2005 17:14:25
Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS release 3 (Taroon)
Kernel 2.4.21-4.ELsmp on an i686
Oracle version 10.1.0
Apache Tomcat/4.1.30
JChem version: 3.0.11
JChem Streams version: 3.0.11
Hello. I am confused as to what degree of canonicalisation is required to make Jchem’s jc_equals and jc_contains functions work correctly (and for best performance). I am only using the Cartridge and plain tables.
Should the smiles in my table be canonicalised using a Jchem function? If so, how?
Should I be passing some canonicalisation parameter when I build the index? If so, how.
Should I canonicalise the input smiles in the query? If so, how.
My testing seems to indicate that Jchem will work without any canonicalisation, but I want to know for definite one way or the other.
Thanks for your advice.
Mark
Kernel 2.4.21-4.ELsmp on an i686
Oracle version 10.1.0
Apache Tomcat/4.1.30
JChem version: 3.0.11
JChem Streams version: 3.0.11
Hello. I am confused as to what degree of canonicalisation is required to make Jchem’s jc_equals and jc_contains functions work correctly (and for best performance). I am only using the Cartridge and plain tables.
Should the smiles in my table be canonicalised using a Jchem function? If so, how?
Should I be passing some canonicalisation parameter when I build the index? If so, how.
Should I canonicalise the input smiles in the query? If so, how.
My testing seems to indicate that Jchem will work without any canonicalisation, but I want to know for definite one way or the other.
Thanks for your advice.
Mark