User a216001020
22-09-2006 11:47:22
The two attached sdf files are for exactly the same structure, only the sequence of atoms in the sdf files is different. However, when I calculate total charges with the option to 'Take resonant structures', I get different charges for the two molecules. For example, the oxygen atom of the amide group gets -0.28 in one case and -0.47 in the other.
The same happens with electronegativities.
Without the option to 'Take resonant structures', properties are unique.
In the GUI window, in one case aromatic bonds are displayed, in the other not, and nitrogen atoms get 5 bonds.
Can anyone find something wrong with my sdf files, or is this a bug?
In order to get unique charges and electronegativities, isn't it safer to choose the option to take resonant structures?
I'm using Marvin Beans installed from marvinbeans-4_1_0-windows.exe on a Windows XP OS.
User 851ac690a0
22-09-2006 14:26:08
Hi,
Yes, this is a bug.
If you select the 'resonant structure option' then the weighted sum of the partial charge of the individual resonant structures are calculated.
Without the 'resonant structure option' only the submitted structure is considered.
Both type of charge distribution can be considered as unique.
But of course , including resonant structures result in more life-like charge distribution.
Jozsi
User a216001020
22-09-2006 16:59:32
Thanks.
When can a fix be expected?
Meanwhile, could you give an idea about the type of structures for which the charges and oen are expected to be affected by the bug.
Could you confirm that the bug does not affect charges and oen calculated without the option to take resonant structures?
User 851ac690a0
22-09-2006 22:20:32
Hi,
This bug will be fixed at this week. I will inform you when we will do a new release (or a bug fix release).
I can not give straightforward descritption about the problematic functional groups.
I can confirm that this bug will attack whenever the 'take
resonant structure' option is selected.
If the 'take resonant structure' option is not selected then this bug does not exist.
Jozsi
User a216001020
17-10-2006 14:04:35
I tried the latest test build marvinbeans-4_1_2 and for the two previously mentioned files of the same structure, the total charges calculated with resonant structures are more similar (e.g. for the oxygen of amide they are -0.5177 and -0.5161) but still not the same.
Is this new version supposed to have fixed the bug and such differences are considered to be acceptable, or will it be further improved?
User 851ac690a0
24-10-2006 13:43:45
Hi,
...such differences are considered to be acceptable, or will it be further improved?
This difference is not acceptable. We will further improve soon.
Jozsi
User 851ac690a0
02-11-2006 03:28:28
Hi,
We have managed to fix this problem.
Now, at least 9-10 digits precision is guaranted for the identical structures.
Jozsi
User a216001020
09-11-2006 11:01:54
Hi Jozsi, when is a version incorporating this fix expected?
User 851ac690a0
09-11-2006 11:05:35
Hi,
If I know well then a release can be expected on this week. May be it will be shifted a couple days.
Jozsi
User a216001020
22-11-2006 14:46:20
Now I tried with Marvin 4.1.3 and I still get cases in which charges are not unique if they are calculated with the 'Take resonant structures' option. I attach two examples. Structures C1.sdf and C2.sdf are exactly the same but get different charges. The same happens with D1.sdf and D2.sdf.
User 851ac690a0
22-11-2006 19:40:06
Hi,
The number of the generated major resonance structures is different for the two identical structures.
You can check this with Marvin: Tools ==> Isomers==> Resonance==>Take major contributors
Now, I have fixed this error in the resonance calculation modul.
(See. the attached picture of the calculated charges of C1 and C2.)
This improved Marvin will be released in two weeks.
Jozsi
User 851ac690a0
24-11-2006 10:58:59
Hi,
Yes, you are right. This was another bug. I fixed already as well.
Thanks for your testing.
Jozsi