Calculation of van der Waals molecular volume and surface

User a90cc68d5c

24-07-2013 16:02:12

The results for van der Waals molecular volume and surface as calculated using Marvin plugs-in, are not in agreement with other published data, such as those from: M. Petitjean, J. Comput. Chem., 15 (No. 5) (1994) 507-523.  A few examples of the discrepancies, in particular for the van der Waals surface areas are considerable as shown in the Table below. 






























































































































Petitjean



Petitjean



Marvin



Marvin



No



CAS



Formula



Name



Vol vdW



Surf vdW



Vol vdW



Surf vdW



1



374-25-4



C4H3BrCIF3



4-bromo-3-chloro-3,4,4-trifluorobut-1-ene



112.349



144.91



119.35



175.84



2



378-1 3-2



C4H4Br2CIF3



1,4-dibromo-2-chloro-1,1,2-trifluorobutane



137.164



172.664



145.22



225.32



3



440-05-1



C11H15FO7



4,5-bis(acetyloxy)-6-fluorooxan-3-yl acetate



198.563



250.17



234.77



390.56



4



463-51 -4



C2H2O



ketene



38.552



58.486



40.77



65.74



5



504-64-3



C3O2



carbon suboxide



54.158



77.828



53.98



80.23



6



511-98-8



C27H45NO2



tomatidine



350.936



369.607



434.53



728.7



7



525-06-4



C14H10O



diphenylethenone



173.769



203.176



182.95



279.34



8



538-75-0



C13H22N2



N-(N-cyclohexylcarboximidoyl)cyclohexanamine



189.063



222.429



221.21



375.09



9



550-33-4



C10H12N4O4



nebularine



181.387



217.081



205.11



317.72



10



572-09-8



C14H19BrO9



acetobromo-α-D-glucose 



270.156



330.612



310.36



505.53



Is there a specific explanation for such large discrepancies?  Some differences can be expected if the van der Waals atomic radii are slightly different in the two methods, but values larger by 60-70% than Petitjean reported numbers are not explaned by this.


 


Best regards,  Serban   


 

ChemAxon 8b644e6bf4

25-07-2013 21:58:59

Dear Serban,


 


Could you send the 3D structures and the van der Waals atomic radii  used in the reference?


 


Regards,


Gabor

User 851ac690a0

09-08-2013 16:49:52

Hi,


 


Is there a specific explanation for such large discrepancies? 

Marvin's  surface area calculator is parametrized specifically for the "H" atoms.It is recomended for peptide and protein structures.   


From your table it is apparent that  the more  H atoms arre in the molecules the largest the difference between Petitjean's and Marvin's surface area. 


So , I collected   21 molecules from Petitjean's paper and a  correction function created from them in order to take into account the effect of the H count on the Van der Waals surface area.


Marvin's results are close to Petitjan's calculated results now. See in the attached file.


Unfortunately I was not able to find the large part of  the structures because their CAS Registry number were not available neither in the "Google search" or in the free database provided by Marvin's molconverter program .  Unused structures are denoted with a question mark in the attached file. 


My conclusion is that we need to implement an alternative method for surface area calculation of small molecules. We work on this now.


Thank you for reporting your results!


 Jozsi