E/Z label bug

User 870ab5b546

23-11-2009 16:57:31

In the following structure, if the iPr group is contracted, Marvin 5.2.6 says that the double bond configuration is Z.  If the iPr group is expanded or ungrouped, it says that the double bond configuration is indeterminate.  It should give the same answer regardless of whether the group is expanded or contracted.  (In this case, indeterminate is a better answer.)


<?xml version="1.0" ?>
<cml>
<MDocument>
<MChemicalStruct>
<molecule molID="m1">
<atomArray
atomID="a1 a2 a3 a4 a5 a6 a7 a8"
elementType="C C R C C C C H"
sgroupRef="0 0 sg1 0 0 0 0 0"
x2="-5.893644605745648 -4.353644605745648 -7.227323727573683 -6.29222593520353 -3.583644605745647 -3.9822259352035303 -2.043644605745648 -3.054269510378216"
y2="-1.0398703531563447 -1.0398703531563447 -0.2698703531563442 0.4476554193288207 -2.3735494749843804 -3.861075247469546 -2.3735494749843804 0.0670046492278411"
/>
<bondArray>
<bond atomRefs2="a1 a2" order="2" />
<bond atomRefs2="a1 a3" order="1">
<bondStereo>W</bondStereo>
</bond>
<bond atomRefs2="a1 a4" order="1">
<bondStereo>H</bondStereo>
</bond>
<bond atomRefs2="a2 a5" order="1">
<bondStereo>W</bondStereo>
</bond>
<bond atomRefs2="a5 a6" order="1" />
<bond atomRefs2="a5 a7" order="2" />
<bond atomRefs2="a2 a8" order="1">
<bondStereo>H</bondStereo>
</bond>
</bondArray>
<molecule id="sg1" role="SuperatomSgroup" title="iPr" molID="m2">
<atomArray
atomID="a9 a10 a11"
elementType="C C C"
attachmentPoint="1 0 0"
x2="-4.623343703044938 -5.957022824872972 -3.289664581216904"
y2="-5.861316994712752 -5.091316994712753 -5.091316994712752"
/>
<bondArray>
<bond atomRefs2="a10 a9" order="1" />
<bond atomRefs2="a9 a11" order="1" />
</bondArray>
</molecule>
</molecule>
</MChemicalStruct>
</MDocument>
</cml>

n style="font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">

ChemAxon 990acf0dec

24-11-2009 23:35:28

Hi Bob,


I apologize for the late answer. There are two different problems:


1. AFAIK, wedge bond types are not taken into account in the determination of E-Z notaion. They are taken as single bonds, and only their position counts.


2. There is certainly an issue with SGroups, because until they are expanded, the indication of E or Z is wrong. We will investigate this problem and come back with more details soon.


Best regards,


Akos

User 870ab5b546

02-12-2009 21:57:52

Any chance you can give me an emergency build of Marvin with this shortcut groups bug fixed?  I have another exam in two weeks.

ChemAxon 990acf0dec

03-12-2009 22:01:34

Hi Bob,


Hopefully we will release the 5.2.7 version sometimes next week.


Best regards,


Akos

User 870ab5b546

04-12-2009 15:47:57

Thanks, much appreciated.  Will the user-detachable sketcher window be reenabled in this version?  (See this discussion.)  

ChemAxon 25dcd765a3

07-12-2009 16:33:43

Hi Bob,


Akos will return tomorrow.


But until know I let you know the info I have gathered.


We are focusing on the Marvin 5.3 release so it seems that the other problem will not be fixed neither in 5.2.7 nor in 5.3.


Sorry for the bad news.


Andras

User 870ab5b546

22-12-2009 14:07:08

My final exam has come and gone, so I no longer have quite the same sense of urgency.  My next exam is in February.  I hope you will have both the E/Z bug fixed and the user-controlled sketcher window restored by then?

ChemAxon 7c2d26e5cf

22-12-2009 16:57:44

I hope we can do it. We will review task priorities after the releasing 5.3 so I can be more specific after it.

User 25d107bd42

25-12-2009 13:19:39

Hi, I have questions here. I have loaded the mrv-file given above in MarvinSketch, see attached image.


What is the meaning of this structure representation ? Does it show the upper double bond from the side ?


Regards, Hans-Ulrich

User 870ab5b546

26-12-2009 16:46:46

A student drew this structure in response to a question.  The problem was that Marvin told the student that the stereochemistry was Z, but when the shortcut groups were ungrouped by JChem, JChem interpreted it as indeterminate. Marvin should have told the student that the stereochemistry was indeterminate.  I don't think the wedge bonds are relevant to the bug.

User 25d107bd42

27-12-2009 20:22:21

Hi Bob,


yes, the wedge bonds are not relevant to the bug. It's a problem of the sgroups.


To show this I have produced the image below. It shows the bug once more on the left side for the sgroup iPr. Replacing this iPr by Cl gives the indeterminate icon (?). Moving the Cl-atom down produces the Z-configuration and now (Z) is correctly shown.


I have tested other sgroups. With Et sometimes it works correctly, sometimes not. With larger sgroups it gets worse. But it's difficult to reproduce the results.


Regards, Hans-Ulrich



User 870ab5b546

31-12-2009 02:16:46










Tamas wrote:

I hope we can do it. We will review task priorities after the releasing 5.3 so I can be more specific after it.



Can you tell me the following:


(1) When will the E/Z shortcut group bug be fixed?  If not in Marvin 5.3.0, then when?


(2) When will the user-detachable sketcher window be restored?


I'm sorry to keep bugging you about them, but these two requests are both very high priority for me, even if they are not so important for your other users.

ChemAxon 8b644e6bf4

31-12-2009 06:19:48

Dear Bob, Dear Hans-Ulrich,


 


Tamas and Akos are on holiday. They will be back next week.


 


Regards,


Gabor

ChemAxon 7c2d26e5cf

04-01-2010 14:41:21

Now, I can not answer for your questions.


Currently we are focusing on Marvin 5.3.0. It will be released in a couple of days. Immediatelly after the release, we hold an internal meeting about tasks priorities for 5.3.1 and about the milestones for 5.4. After this meeting, I can tell you how your tasks are scheduled.

User 870ab5b546

24-01-2010 00:46:12

What is the status of the E/Z bug fix?  It's very important for it to be correct for students.

ChemAxon 990acf0dec

25-01-2010 14:16:20

Hi Bob,


Sorry for the late answer; this bug will be fixed in 5.3.1.


Best regards,


Akos

ChemAxon 990acf0dec

25-02-2010 14:11:04

Hi Bob,

I would like to inform you that we had to make an urgent patch release that was named 5.3.1, therefore the fix promised in this topic will be included only in the patch release coming at the end of March (probably named 5.3.2).

Best regards,

Akos