User 870ab5b546
21-09-2009 21:51:00
In the attached figure, see how far the + charge is from the S. In fact, it's closer to the O than to the S. This is a problem.
User 870ab5b546
21-09-2009 21:51:00
In the attached figure, see how far the + charge is from the S. In fact, it's closer to the O than to the S. This is a problem.
ChemAxon e500b51457
22-09-2009 19:57:14
Hi Bob,
Thank you for reporting. We will notify you as soon as the improvement is ready.
Best regards,
Erika
User 870ab5b546
08-12-2010 03:27:04
| Erika wrote: |
Hi Bob, Thank you for reporting. We will notify you as soon as the improvement is ready. Best regards, Erika |
The remote location of the charge is still a problem, even in Marvin 5.4.0. You need to place the charge closer to the atom to which it belongs, even when displaying lone pairs.
ChemAxon e500b51457
08-12-2010 21:40:55
Hi Bob,
Unfortunately, we didn't have capacity for this improvement in version 5.4.
Regards,Erika
User 870ab5b546
08-12-2010 21:42:37
It's been more than a year since i made this request. It's a fundamental esthetic problem that will bother a lot of users. I hope you will move it up on your priority list.
ChemAxon e500b51457
15-12-2010 10:31:44
You are right, we have raised the priority of this problem.
Regards,
Erika
ChemAxon d51151248d
02-11-2012 11:30:02
The rendering problem has been tested on Marvin 5.10.0 and it is already solved.
User 25d107bd42
02-11-2012 14:08:54
Hi,
but the charges symbols are still too tiny:
https://www.chemaxon.com/forum/ftopic9209.html
referring to Marvin 5.11.3.
Best regards, Hans-Ulrich