User 164a01df82
18-03-2009 17:29:42
Hi,
I just recalculated partial charges with cxcalc 5.2.0 for FAD (attached) and I get different results:
- with version 5.1.3_2, the total charge was -1.99998, which is ok (expected = -2);
- with version 5.2.0, the total charge is -2.19781.
Partial charges were calculated with the same options for both software versions using the same input file:
cxcalc -S charge --precision 5 --type total --resonance true FAD_ini.mrv > FAD.sdf
Is there a bug in the newest version?
Thanks,
Rui Rodrigues
I just recalculated partial charges with cxcalc 5.2.0 for FAD (attached) and I get different results:
- with version 5.1.3_2, the total charge was -1.99998, which is ok (expected = -2);
- with version 5.2.0, the total charge is -2.19781.
Partial charges were calculated with the same options for both software versions using the same input file:
cxcalc -S charge --precision 5 --type total --resonance true FAD_ini.mrv > FAD.sdf
Is there a bug in the newest version?
Thanks,
Rui Rodrigues