User 25d107bd42
19-01-2008 20:58:55
When I produce a Gaussian cube-file editing a molecule in MarvinSketch (example indigo), computing Tools-Geometry-Geometry and saving it as Gaussian cube file, I get the file indigo1.cub. Opening this file with GaussView I get the picture you see in the screenshot. What's wrong ?
ChemAxon 909aee4527
21-01-2008 13:24:24
Hi Hans-Ulrich,
this can be an Angstrom-Bohr representation issue.
Can you give us the generated cube file and also the version number of GaussView?
Is the saved structure correct if you just sketch and save it (without computing Geometry)?
Kind regards,
Judit
User 25d107bd42
21-01-2008 15:32:17
To discuss things detailed I will send two posts.
First the cube-file indigo1.cub produced with Marvin 4.1.13, calculating the geometry and saving as indigo1.cub.
Bildschirmphoto235: The file indigo1.cub
Bildschirmphoto236: Opening indigo1.cub with Marvin and showing the bond lengths. Looks good and seems to be Angstrom.
Bildschrimphoto237: Opening indigo1.cub with GaussView 3.0.7. To much bonds calculated from the Cartesian coordinates.
The next post comes immediately after this one.
User 25d107bd42
21-01-2008 15:42:13
Producing the molecule with Marvin, adding explicitly the H-Atoms and saving as indigo3.cub
Bildschirmphoto239: The file indigo3.cub
Bildschirmphoto238: Opening indigo3.cub with Marvin. Standard C-C etc. bonds, but C-H-bonds are very long (Coming of course from the standard bond length in drawing the molecules).
Bildschirmphoto240: Opening indigo3.cub in GaussView.
ChemAxon 909aee4527
22-01-2008 16:00:54
Hi Hans-Ulrich,
there was a problem in the cube file export in Marvin 4.1.13, but it is already corrected in 5.0.0.
The cube files generated with 5.0 seem to appear correctly, though we could test it with GaussView 4.0 only.
Kind regards,
Judit
User 25d107bd42
22-01-2008 17:36:50
Hi Judit,
this is a very good message. As a long year programmer, I hesitate to use x.0.0 versions. But in this case I will do it (in spite of the problem with the help button I've already posted). See Screenshot243, opening indigo4.cub with GaussView 3.0.7.
I have already had the suspicion that the failure is in line 4-6. Seems to be a 3x3 matrix for the xyz-Coordinates. In the correct file there are the conversions au / Angstrom, see Screenshot244.
And there is a new feature in Marvin: You can now produce Gaussian *.com files. We are using Gaussian for ab initio calculations and now we have two ways to produce input files: GaussView and Marvin.
Kind regards, Hans-Ulrich
ChemAxon 909aee4527
22-01-2008 17:46:17