User 717c2fe15b
17-02-2006 09:10:00
Hello:
I should have mentioned in my last post that I would also like to use action strings with the standardizer to find the lowest energy conformer, starting with a 2D molecule. Is this automatically done using clean:full? However, as I posted before, use of ..clean:full.. does not convert a 2D mol file into a 3D one.
John
ChemAxon fb166edcbd
17-02-2006 16:41:17
3D clean tries to give the lowest energy conformer but it is not guaranteed. It gives a "local minimum" but it is not known whether it is also the global minimum or not. We have a clean option which increases the processing time but also increases the probability of finding the lowest energy conformer. Currently this option is not available in Standardizer but I will also add this in JChem 3.2.
User dc29f3beec
16-05-2011 16:18:27
In the latest version or JChem, what would be the steps to find the global minimum (lowest energy conformer) rather than the local minimum? The increase in processing time is not a concern.
Thanks,
Graham
ChemAxon 1b9e90b2e7
18-05-2011 08:54:39
gwatts wrote: |
In the latest version or JChem, what would be the steps to find the global minimum (lowest energy conformer) rather than the local minimum? The increase in processing time is not a concern.
Thanks,
Graham
|
Hi Graham,
molconvert -H3D may help you. However the help lacks examples and thats why it may a bit hard to interpret. It will improve.
The
molconvert -3:[ca]{1}{50} mol test.smiles -o testCA.mol
command you need.
[ca] means conformational analysis
1 means save only the first and lowest energy conformer
50 means try to generate maximum 50 conformers.
User dc29f3beec
18-05-2011 17:00:52
Adrian,
This was exactly the command I was looking for. This is perfect. Thanks you very much for your help, I appreciate it very much.
Thanks,
Graham